Bolt also establishes an anti-authoritarian theme which recurs throughout his works. The king storms off, telling More he will leave him alone provided More does not speak out against the divorce. His own position is depicted as almost indefensible; the Pope is described as a "bad" and corrupt individual, forced by the Emperor Charles V to act according to his will.
Rich is reluctant and guilt-ridden, but he ultimately agrees to tell Cromwell about the bribe that More received and passed on to him. Rich laments that he has lost his innocence, and the scene suggests that Rich has sold his soul to the devil.
However, More does tell the king that More cannot agree to the divorce, reminding him that the king promised not to bother More about it. In his approach to moral action, More is thoroughly pragmatic, but not, like Cromwell or Rich, at the expense of his beliefs.
In Act One, scene eight, Rich gives Cromwell information about the silver cup in exchange for a job. Wolsey accuses More of being too moralistic and recommends that he be more practical. More is sentenced to death but not before he can express his disapproval of the Supremacy Act and his disappointment with a government that would kill a man for keeping quiet.
In exchange, Cromwell offers Rich a job. After fretting over his absence, the family eventually finds him busy at vespers evening prayers. Even his wife and daughter cannot know his reasons, because he does not want to put them in the position of having to testify against him later.
At another key point of the play, More testifies before an inquiry committee and Norfolk attempts to persuade him to sign the Succession to the Crown Act pp. If we should bump into one another, recognize me.
All people in positions of power — King Henry, Cromwell, Wolsey, Cranmer, Chapuys, even Norfolk — are depicted as being either corrupt, evil, or at best expedient and power-hungry.
Stage productions[ edit ] Paul Scofieldwho played the leading role in the West End premiere, reprised it on Broadway inwinning a Tony Award.
Table of Contents Plot Overview The Common Man figures prominently both in the plot of the play and also as a narrator and commentator. Roper follows ideals instead of a his conscience or the law, and More argues that attempting to navigate high-minded ideals is akin to being lost at sea.
But damn it, Thomas, look at those names. Cromwell calls More to his office and attempts to malign More by accusing him of sympathizing with the Holy Maid of Kent, who was executed for treason.
The place of the Common Man in history is emphasized when he says in his opening speech, "the sixteenth century was the century of the Common Man-like all the other centuries. Although treated in more detail in other sections, in the following plot summary, his presence is indicated only when he interacts directly with the other characters in the play.
Norfolk proves that More gave the cup to Rich as soon as More realized it was a bribe, and Cromwell is forced to come up with some other way to entrap More. A man for all seasons. More deconstructs both these charges, but when Cromwell reads a letter from King Henry calling More a villain, More is genuinely shaken.
And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? And, as time requireth, a man of marvelous mirth and pastimes, and sometime of as sad gravity.
Bolt implies that because we cannot comprehend the moral alignment of the universe, much less wrap it up in a tidy theory, we should focus our energy on improving ourselves and our society.A Man For All Seasons Questions and Answers.
The Question and Answer section for A Man For All Seasons is a great resource to ask questions, find answers, and discuss the novel. Below is an essay on "Moral Corruption in a Man for All Seasons" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
Moral corruption in A Man for All Seasons There are many issues that people have to deal with in a society.
A Man for All Seasons, written by Robert Bolt, is known for the illustration of opposing ideologies and the subjective views of morality.
In 'A Man for All Seasons' integrity and corruption are overarching themes which are involved in the development of the play's characters. A Man For All Seasons Essay Examples.
An Analysis of the Allegiance of Thomas More and the Common Man in the Play A Man For All Seasons by Roger Bolt. 1, words. The Presence of Corruption and Evil in Sixteenth Century England in A Man for All Seasons, a Play by Robert Bolt.
Morality is often overpowered by materialistic pursuits. In “A Man for All Seasons”,Robert Bolt shows the corruption of those who put self interest above all other values. His use of such characters as Thomas Cromwell, Richard Rich, Chapuys and Wolsey help convey this corruption.
There is yet. While A Man For All Seasons focuses heavily on the social downfall and moral strength of Sir Thomas More, it also covers the inverse process involving a number of other characters - most specifically the identifiable corruption of Richard Rich, who throughout the course of the play loses his innocence.Download