Approaches which concentrate on how socialization systems—particularly formal education systems—help to construct, disseminate, and legitimate a commonly understood and accepted ritual and symbolic language and system of meaning within a society—thereby structuring the experience of individuals who are often presented as tabula rasa—are often described as Durkheimian or functionalist.
Where active participation supports the integrative or the social reproductive functions of education, the analyses of social action theorists overlap with those of Durkheimians and Marxists. Formal education systems have played a major role in the formation of the modern nation state; they have often been the main means though which a common language has been disseminated and a national identity constructed in Appolonian dionysian essay population.
Marxist and neoMarxist approaches to the study of education largely replaced functionalist and Durkheimian approaches in the s with studies of how class and ethnic inequalities were reproduced through the education system in the USA and UK.
Such analyses have been particularly influential in the study of large-scale modern societies where it is impossible for all the individuals to know each other personally.
Marxist theories have also focused on the way in which education practices produce social beings but rather than seeing these as aids to social integration they have concentrated on how they maintain and reproduce social difference.
Social action theorists have focused on how the individual actors in the educational setting help to construct or resist its formal structures. The study of education, therefore, has clearly been important in the work of anthropologists of ethnicity and nationalism such as Benedict Anderson and Ernest Gellner.
As Willis showed in his account of working-class youth in the UK, for example, the subcultures of resistance formed by these youths to the middle-class curriculum often only served to recreate the class structure of the wider society. The assumptions on which anthropologists base their research effect not only what they look at but also the types of questions they ask and the conclusions they are likely to draw.
Through their interaction with the economic and religious elements of the social system, they have helped to develop a national work ethic and inculcate national spiritual values. Sometimes these distinctions are discussed in terms of the child as tabula rasa, the Apollonian child the child as naturally goodand the Dionysian child the child as innately wilful.
For example, in the case of socializing children, is the child a passive object waiting to be molded by society, or an already formed individual which just needs an environment in which it can naturally develop, or a person intent on pursuing its own interests and on whom society has to impose its will see Jahoda and Lewis ?
Social action theorists, however, generally suggest that there is a range of reactions to the learning process in any educational setting as well as a range of teaching styles.Transformation from Apollonian to Dionysian Writers often bring mythology into their writing to give the storyline and characters more depth and complexity.
In Death in Venice by Thomas Mann, Mann uses the gods Apollo and Dionysus and the struggle between opposites to demonstrate the ultimate downfall of the novella’s main character. In Dionysian cultures they are taught to express emotions.
Loud speech is expected. Beliefs that one should state a view by using extreme language are common (e.g., as found among some Arabs), and attitudes such as the positive evaluation of touching, kissing, close positioning of the bodies, looking into the eye, and other behaviors are.
- The Apollonian and Dionysian man complete each other in the sense that these two terms create our society. The Apollonian man was given its name from Apollo, the sun- god. He represents light, clarity, and form. Apollonian and Dionysian Essays: OverApollonian and Dionysian Essays, Apollonian and Dionysian Term Papers, Apollonian and Dionysian Research Paper, Book Reports.
ESSAYS, term and research.
When I analyze my personality, I would describe myself as both Apollonian and Dionysian. Due to the fact that I was raised by an Apollonian family, I think I will naturally and psychologically tend to me more Apollonian than Dionysian simply because my mind was trained for so many years to be that way.
Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.Download